Monday, 22 April 2013


POLITICS AND POWER

This assignment will discuss and focus on politics and power, referring to the discourse of the digital divide on the democracy and the government of South Africa. It will define the concepts such as digital divide, e-democracy and e-government and explain the impact of the digital divide on democracy and the government of South Africa and give relevant example/examples.

CaricomicT4D (2008) define digital divide as the gap or imbalance that exist between those who have access to information and communications technology and also to the unequal access of resources. CaricomicT4D (2008) stated that the digital divide can exist between those living in rural areas and those living in urban areas, between the educated and uneducated, between economic classes, and on a global scale between move and less industrially developed nations.

According to Clift (2003) e-democracy is the use of information and communications technologies and strategies by “democratic sectors” within the political processes of local communities, states/regions, and nations and on the global stage.

Clift (2003) stated that the “democratic sectors” include the following democratic actors:

-       Governments.
-       Elected officials.
-       Media (and major online portals).
-       Political parties and Interest groups.
-       Civil Society Organizations.
-       International Governmental Organizations.
-       Citizens/Voters.

“E-government refers to the use by government agencies of information technologies that have the ability to transform relations with citizens, businesses, and other arms of government. These technologies can serve a variety of different ends, better delivery of government services to citizens, improved interactions with business and industry, citizen empowerment through access to information, or more efficient government management” (World Bank).

Cohen(2000) states that the impact of the digital divide on the government of South Africa is the powerful influence on the public’s access to government documents, the tactics and content of political campaigns and the ways in which topic discourse

Cohen (2000) defined some of the impact of digital divide on the government as:

-       Cost effectiveness- reduces cost in rendering services.
-      Time saving- reducing delays in delivery of services.
-       Improve communication- communication between government and citizens.
-       Improve operations and services – improving quality of service delivery.
-       Expand access- citizen’s access to public sector information.
-       Increase efficiency- e-governance that produces more output at the same total cost in less time.
-       Increase effectiveness- governance that works better, producing the same outputs at the same total cost in the same time, but to a higher quality standard.

    Bellamy, Christine & Charles (1999:518) stated some of the impact of the digital divide on the democracy of South Africa as:

-       Legislations that protects freedom of expression on the internet.
-       Providing access to public information online.
-       Voting online.
-       Consulting citizens in online citizen panels, focus groups, open discussion forums.
-       Citizens contacting individual politicians online, through e-mail, chatting, websites etc.
-       Include information support systems for politicians as well as election, monitoring and other applications.
-       Public debate, online access to information for scrutinizing the government.

Relevant Examples

South Africa government has embraced the idea and publishes information via the internet. Some government department makes use of mobile technology to communicate with citizen e.g.

“The department of Home Affairs introduced a service for South Africans to check the progress on approving their Identity document and passport applications via short message service (sms)” (South Africa-the good news, 2008).

The department of Home Affairs not only has introduced a service for the progress on approving on particular document. It has a website where the society of South Africa can contacts the home affairs; get access to the immigration service, statement and speeches and forms where the society can apply for passport and identity document online. The department has introduced the website service which can inform the society about the members of the department their role and how the society can contact them and the late news on the parliament and department.

This assignment has discussed and analyzed the impact of the digital on the democracy and government of South Africa. It has focus on how digital divide helps the society of South Africa informed about the democracy and government they live in. It has defined concepts like digital divide, e-democracy and e-government.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bellamy, Christine & Charies, R. 1999. “Wiring up the deck-chairs?” Parliamentary affairs. Vol.52. No.3, July.

CaricomiT4D. Thursday 18 September 2008. European Union. Available: http:www.caricomict4d.org/ict-for-develop… [Accessed: 19 April 2013]

Clift, S. 2003. E-democracy, e-governance and public net-work. September Version 1.1. Available: http://www.publicus.net . [Accessed: 19 April 2013]

Cohen, T. 2000. Governance and human rights online. Available: http: www.wits.ac.za/research/r_9.html. [Accessed: 19 April 2013].

South African- The good news. 2008. Mobile internet users exceed pc users. 27 November. Available: http:www.sagoodnews.co.za. [Accessed: 19 April 2013].

World Bank. Available: http://go.worldbank.org/m1JHE02280 [Accessed: 19 April 2013].

No comments:

Post a Comment